By  John Giglio / 24 Feb 2026 / Topics: Artificial Intelligence (AI) , Managed services , Cybersecurity

The modern security organization is currently caught in a “perfect storm.” On one hand, threats are escalating in sophistication — often amplified by the same generative AI we try to use for defense. On the other hand, we have a global shortage of skilled talent, which leaves teams redlined and overstretched.
But let’s be real: the “talent shortage” narrative is a bit of a misnomer. It’s not so much a headcount deficit; rather, we have a crisis of capability and efficiency.
For years, we tried to solve the “more threats” problem by throwing more “eyes on glass” at screens. Spoiler alert: It failed.
The traditional SOC model — built on a “pyramid” of Tier 1 analysts doing manual triage — is collapsing. The math just doesn’t work anymore. The average enterprise SOC receives thousands of alerts daily; for large organizations, that can exceed 10,000 alerts per day. No human army can keep up with that volume, which is why recent 2025/2026 data shows that 40% of alerts go uninvestigated, and up to 61% of teams admit to ignoring alerts that later proved critical because there’s simply no bandwidth.
The “external notification” gut check: If the “eyes on glass” model worked, we’d catch everything internally. But the data from Mandiant shows a different story: 54% to 63% of compromise notifications come from external sources — like law enforcement or the adversary themselves.
This is what we call a Schrödinger’s Job Market. The shortage is “felt” as burnout and unaddressed risk, but it’s not being acted upon with entry-level hiring because doubling a team that misses 60% of breaches doesn’t solve the core issue.
We need a fundamental shift in how we operate. We’re talking about moving from rigid, playbook-driven automation (SOAR) to the Agentic SOC.
Unlike the old linear scripts, AI agents can autonomously plan, reason, and execute complex investigations. By leveraging Google Security Operations and Gemini, we’re seeing a total transformation:
This effectively “decapitates” the traditional entry-level path by automating the grunt work that used to be the “apprenticeship” for new engineers. We’re moving from a pyramid workforce to a diamond shape: fewer juniors, but many more mid-level engineers who can manage these autonomous systems.
Building a fully functional, 24/7 SOC from scratch is prohibitively expensive — we’re talking $1M to $4M annually. For most, the math just doesn’t work.
That’s why we’re seeing a massive pivot toward Managed Detection and Response (MDR). It’s about “buying” talent because “building” it has become too slow and risky.
| Cost Component | In-House SOC (Annual) | Managed SecOps (Annual) |
|---|---|---|
| Staffing (24/7) | $1.2M - $2.0M | Included |
| Technology Stack | $300k - $500k | Included |
| Total Estimated Cost | $1.65M - $2.8M | $120k - $560k |
By partnering with Insight for Managed SecOps, you aren’t just getting a vendor; you’re getting an operational extension of your team. We provide:
The direct-entry cyber pro era is ending; the cyber-specialized engineer era is here. We must stop teaching manual log analysis as a primary skill and start teaching security engineering.
The bottom line: The SOC of 2026 isn’t a room full of people staring at screens. It’s a data center full of AI agents watched over by a lean, elite team.
Is your SOC operating model built for the AI era? Quantify the impact of modernizing your defense. Read IDC’s Business Value of Security Operations report to explore how Google Security Operations is transforming threat detection and team efficiency for global enterprises.
Are you ready to stop firefighting and start focusing on strategic risk? Reach out to us today to see how we can modernize your defense and quantify the impact of a Managed SecOps model.